Monday, November 3, 2014

In a World...

In a World... where Bobby picks female lead films which are also written, directed and produced by said female... I think Lake Bell delivers a winner.

To start, I was really attracted to the premise. We get a look at a oft ignored piece of show business centered around a phrase that has been incredibly prominent. Don La Fontaine was a voice that everybody recognized, but likely couldn't put a name to. I thought the resurrection of his famed 'In a World...' line was a brilliant approach to the film. The film presents the voice-over business in a way that appealing and interesting to both movie buffs and general audiences, which is a big part of what makes it such a success for me.

In a World... revolves around Carol Solomon and her relationship to the voice acting world. She's a genuinely likable character... quirky, witty, intelligentWhen we first see her she's simply a voice coach, knowing she has the ability to play a bigger role in the business if it wasn't such an exclusive boys club. I like that Carol getting her first big voiceover gig wasn't made into a slow built climatic event, but just a subtle 'this happened' moment over the phone. It didn't feel like it was forced upon the audience, but a natural show that women do have a voice here... which is clearly a major theme in the movie.

Carol's relationship with her father is essentially the personified version of her relationship to the industry. She's always kept at arms length, and hardly has any support. Of course, there's more to her family dealings that that, but it does come back around when we see Sam dedicate his award to his daughters. It doesn't feel sincere to me, he's just using them as a tool, just as the industry (represented by Geena Davis) used Carol's female voice for the quadrilogy.

The supporting characters are also well defined and each gives us distinct and fleshed out personalities. Their involvment makes the story feel like more than just a daughter's battle to get out of her father's shadow and limitations.

Bell was great in the lead role. She delivers the personality in detail and has fantastic timing. She provided plenty of comedic moments and, I thought, managed extremely well with her Fred Melamed stood out as Sam Sotto, delivering his lines with the perfect tone and temperment. And look a flip phone like Jon's! Ken Marino does well in a familiar type of role (Wet Hot American Summer, East Bound and Down), but adds something extra with his voice as well. Demitri Martin and Rob Corddry fit in well their normal awkward roles.  Nick Swanson's mustache fell of, but Nick Offerman is always solid. The cast did a suberb job overall, and showed a great deal of chemistry.

I think that chemistry added to an already good dialogue. Conversations felt natural and, more importantly, realistic. The inclusion of some quick wit ('If a beanie baby could talk..') and repeat jokes ('excited or farting') were subtle and well done. They reminded me of the kind of wit we experience in real life... it's there, but not over the top like in something such as Juno.

I'm guessing any major issues with this movie will come with the side stories. Sure, we can do without the romance between Carol and Louis, but it allows her personality to be on full display (away from work) and also Louis comes in as strong support for the female voice... even if in a sort of cliche way from his speech. We don't really care abotu Jamie, but this also fleshes out Sam world. And most of all, Moe and Dani. On its own it can seem completely out of place and a secondary plot altogether. But I think both characters, as well as their relationship, play a very important role in Carol's life and support system. They also round out the entire family plot with Carol, Dani and their father. It's still a slight distraction because it seems so distant from the main focus at times, but isn't a huge negative for me.

Technically, I think Bell did a great job directing. I didn't feel like any shots were off or misplaced. The cuts felt right, with no clunkiness. I mentioned the dialogue, but i really think that was a strong point of her script that deserves attention. I think it's an incredibly strong work, not just for a debut, but in a general light.

I found myself laughing, sometimes audibly others just a light chuckle... which scored major points for the film. We've discussed comedy enough to know how that works if a viewer isn't feeling it's humor. More on point though, I was feeling Bell's message. Extending the female voice in such a well done and intelligent way works well here. While she apparently felt the need to drive it home in the last seen while she's coaching the women, I don't think it was over the top or to strong.. but meshed well with Carol's journey throughout the movie.

I feel like could go on to more, but I need to wrap this up for now. I can see this getting a pretty wide array of grades, and feel I may be higher than most (if not all) here. I initially graded this as an A when I saw it a few months back, and feel comfortable sticking to that. I truly enjoyed this movie.... from the acting, to the humor, to the dialogue, to the plot and overall introduction to the voice over business. From the initial voice mail from Louis and Carol's play on it, to the final moment of female empowerment, I was in. It wasn't perfect or a masterpiece, but it's a damn fine film, and one of my favorites that I've watched this year. Grade: A

47 comments:

  1. Also, I think we get a lead actress nod for Lake Bell and a supporting nomination for Melamed.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  3. In a World where Bobby’s first 3 paragraphs do such a great job summing up the movie I can move on and add 2 cents and rebuttals…

    Bobby mentions potential issues with the side stories but I felt this was about the perfect amount of side stories. They were enough to not only introduce you to but allow you to get to know the people in Carol’s life. I would place this movie in a sub-category of “Comedy: Coming of Age” and to be successful as a coming of age story you have to be introduced to a characters vulnerabilities and shortcomings and along the way reveal that growth and accomplishment and In a World did that well. In the early going as Sam is kicking Carol out with the awesome line “I’m going to support you by not supporting you” we see her struggling with her voice and her dad putting her down for it and basically ignoring her wants by telling her to stick to accents. To me, her voice cracking was representative of her shattered confidence by growing up with the dream of following in her father’s footsteps while he constantly tells her to stop wasting her time. The best aspect of Bell’s performance was her balancing Carol’s insecurities that resulted from this relationship her dad with the mentality that she was going to make it anyway and show him. Had she been called in advance to audition for the part she stole from Gustav she probably would’ve gotten in her head about it and choked, because it was a spur of the moment and she was just filling in she nailed it and her career took off from there. I was shocked that Dimitri Martin was so good, he nailed the supportive/secretly but not so secretly in love/nerdy producer guy.

    Worth repeating what Bobby said, the realness earned major bonus points for this movie. Most every character and conversation was totally believable. One thing I didn’t like that stood out was Gustav. His name and his portrayal were both way over the top for me. I didn’t believe that Carol would’ve hooked up with him especially after her sucked her nose twice. She didn’t seem like she’d be one to fall for his shtick that would work on groupies. I felt like it was just in there to be a minor hurdle toward her and Dimitri Martin’s character getting together and set up Sam for the realization that his protégé banged his daughter. While Bobby points out that we don’t care about Jamie I like her inclusion because it supports the realistic aspects of the movie in that Sam’s daughters absolutely resent her and make fun of her behind her back at every opportunity whether it’s the age difference by calling her a groupie or just finding something without merit to make fun of her by mocking her non-ironic Midwestern accent. It’s important for realism to give your characters flaws and Jamie’s inclusion and Dani’s not-quite the tip infidelity gave us some flaws to our characters. Also on Jamie I will disagree with Bobby on the sincerity of Sam’s acceptance speech. I was happy that they gave Jamie the line, albeit predictable that Sam needs to stop feeling sorry for himself and be proud of his daughter. I think he was surprised by her reaction and never expected his groupie girlfriend to call him out on it and ultimately realized how shitty he was acting.

    Ultimately it was cute and I lean towards funny although I didn’t do a lot of laughing but very well written and directed and felt real. Had I had a couple out loud laughs or a couple tears it would’ve hit the A range. B+

    Fun fact Actress Melissa Disney played a character named Melinda Chisney.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Double fun fact, Melissa Disney is apparently a voice actress who actually does do movie trailers... Solid nod to the movie's purpose there!

      Delete
    2. I didn't even remember her character. Who was she?

      Delete
  4. Bobby largely did such a good job at the nuts and bolts, I'll just say that I agree. But, I just can't give this movie an A.

    As I've mentioned before, I have a cap of a B+ for most comedies. By their nature, they're really not complete works of "art." They have an inherent goofiness and usually leads to some bad scenes, irrational characters and dumb dialogue. If a comedy can avoid those 3, it can get past that ceiling. (btw, I generally will never watch a comedy on my own, so maybe it's just an irrational bias that I'm trying to justify here.)

    Again, I liked most of this movie and laughed out loud quite a few times, but Bobby covered all of that. Here are just the negatives that prevented this from breaching the B+ ceiling.

    Gustav. He was just too slapsticky for me. This character could have been done better. He was a petulant child with occasional charm in the beginning, but by the end he fell into that one-dimensional character type. Sam was a petulant man-child as well, but he kept some depth in the end.

    I didn't really like the end scene. It was a bit too silly. I don't mind that the groupie wife called him out, but the whole scene was just a bit too much. It's a scene like this that just caps the potential of a comedy. I think writing the climax of a comedy might be the hardest of all movie genres to do with competence.

    Some things I loved that I wanted to point out:
    Sigourney Weaver telling her that she's not really special, but instead being used was great.

    Martin and his coworkers had me laughing out loud. He did a great job. And Eva Longoria repeating her lines and the jokes about her were hilarious. Is that what you think, you stupid slapper? Yes. Yes it is, Eva.

    The one-liners were all pretty good. I love some dry humor.

    I like that she's still teaching classes in the end. It shows she still has work to do. Plus we got that I'm not getting a job "because I sound like a sexy baby" line.

    Hooking up with Gustav was fine by me. He's a decent enough looking dude and interesting and she wanted to get laid I guess. I mean, she bragged about it when she got home. If it was a guy, we wouldn't question the hook-up at all. Welcome to a new era, guys. Where were all these sexed up and forward thinking ladies when we were in college? Don't say Riley's room, either.

    The fucking deli meat buffet thing got me every time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Geena Davis and Sigourney Weaver don't even look alike

      Delete
    2. I'm so fucking embarrassed. My memory is awful.

      Delete
  5. I feel like I’m going to be accused of hating women after reading Bobby’s review. The high points for me in this movie were the mention of fantasy baseball and the sandwich bar date. However, the whole sandwich bar relationship storyline didn’t seem to fit anywhere. The guy Carol ends up dating is a fun character.

    The guys in this movie were mostly jerks, and I think the dad tried to make up for it with his Lifetime Achievement Award speech, but I’m not buying it. Saying that fluff after an award is much less touch than a personal conversation.

    I’m not sure what this movie was trying to be - a drama, a comedy, a mix? As I look at my notes and look back at this one, I just don’t see an engaging character or storyline.

    Having read Bobby’s review, I feel like I watched an entirely different movie. This one lies somewhere in between Frances Ha (D-ish) and You and Me and Everyone (B-ish). I’m starting at a C.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bryan and I discussed it a bit in chat.. but basically...

      I think in this environment, it's pretty accurate with the guys being jerks. We see a whole lot of arrogance in general... now enter a world where men dominate the industry. We saw the arrogance from La Fontaine right away... "As long as I'm one of (5 people getting paid) them, that's how it should be!" Sam Sotto was spot on to this attitude.

      Dramedy!

      Delete
  6. Burying this review b/c I'm so "blah" about this movie.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Look at Bobby with the late push for Review of the Year! Spot on with the relationships as personification in regards to Carol. Scratch that off my list of things to talk about. Overall, I enjoyed In A World. I liked all the characters, the storyline was solid, and everyone played their part very well. I only have two gripes with the movie, one minor and one major: Bell played it very safe, and the structure felt very sitcom-esque to me and was a little fluff filled for a 90 minute movie.

    I think the praise for this movie really belongs to Lake Bell. Bell did a great job pretty much making this movie from start to finish. You could tell for everyone involved it was a labor of love. Others have mentioned that the conversations were really good and felt real, and I have to agree. This was something I loved about Frances Ha, which I was at least a tiny bit reminded of here in that respect. All of the relationships were well-done, especially the pivot Carol-Sam relationship. The great thing about all these relationships is, like it was said before, they all felt very real. Very genuine movie all-in-all.

    Now, I think it feels so genuine and real because beyond remembering their character names as opposed to real names, I didn’t feel like anyone was doing anything particularly challenging here. I think Bell wrote a lot of these characters for specific people she was friends with already. Demitri Martin is playing Demitri Martin. Ken Marino has done that character multiple times. Even Bell herself didn’t stretch too much. There isn’t anything particularly wrong with this – no one is gonna get mad at a football coach for putting the fastest guy with good hands as his #1 WR after all – but it does put that sort of artificial ceiling on the acting for all involved, as there was a pretty low degree of difficulty here. The only person really playing against type was Nick Offerman, who I wish would’ve had more screen time as one of the best side characters in the main plot.

    My real gripe with the movie is the side stuff. The script felt structured like a sitcom. In most sitcoms, an episode might have two or three storylines going on, generally not connected. This makes sense in that regard because the audience already has an established relationship with those characters and those characters can flow in and out of being the main story versus a side story from week-to-week. Having side stories in a movie where I have no connection to the characters going in and will not see ever again more than likely seems very pointless. I liked Moe and Dani and they may have been two of my favorite characters, but their storyline is pointless. The one movie I can kind of compare this to is “Crazy, Stupid, Love,” which does as good of a job as I’ve seen recently of building multiple story lines in a rom-com and having them all converge in a satisfying way. For a movie this short, I don’t see the necessity of having any action that doesn’t maintain the plot as a whole. The saving grace here is that the characters in these unnecessary side plots (Moe, Dani, and Louis) are characters I like, so I’m glad Bell found time for them. I just wish those subplots lent themselves to the overall movie a little better.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Beyond the interesting idea of delving into the voiceover industry, this movie is essentially a lob that Bell knocked out of the park. It’s one of those movies that sounds kind of weird on paper, but then you say the cast and what their roles are, and you’re pretty much in because you know what you’re going to get from the majority of those involved. There isn’t a single weak spot in this movie, but there’s nothing that, to steal a line from Adam Carolla, is moving the needle either. (Speaking of Carolla, this movie had a similar budget to his next movie Road Hard. Carolla hopefully runs the Bell playbook and it turns out just as good.) I thought the side stuff was unnecessary, but I still found it enjoyable. I wish I didn’t spend so much of this review complaining about things, because I did really like this movie. Bobby just already said most of my thoughts.

    + Lot of great character interactions
    + Carol-Sam relationship was a perfect parallel to women in the voiceover world
    + Everyone played their part well
    - The side stories didn’t go anywhere

    Grade: A-

    ReplyDelete
  10. I wrote a Letterboxd review of this movie a few months ago, and this is mostly going to be a rehash of that. Basically, I completely agree with Phil about this being the equivalent of a dramedic TV series, such that there's a B, C, and D plot that are all vaguely connected to the A plot. It's a weird structure for a movie. There's time to appropriately service all these characters over a season of TV, but the opposite is true with a movie. Pick one path, maybe two, and go with it. This should have just been Carol in pursuit of the trailer, plus maybe her relationship with Demetri Martin. As is, there's too much, which isn't to say those more disconnected pieces are bad. In fact, the stuff with Moe and Dani is pretty great, but it doesn't belong in this movie.

    As a big consumer of cartoons, I've got a lot of respect for voiceover people, and I'm glad Bell chose to make this film in that world. Every time a celebrity gets picked for an animated movie, a much more talented voice actor goes uncompensated. My favorite parts of In a World revolve around this, particularly the vocal warmup montages and the time spent in the recording booth. It's just an interesting part of filmmaking that often gets overlooked.

    As has already been said, Bell is fine to very good onscreen and behind the camera. I love the choice to withhold her trailer voice until the big reveal, even when there's an opportunity to show her action. Her clumsy gangliness, which Bell hits a lot, goes a long way towards humanizing this ridiculously beautiful woman. On the page, the relationship between Carol and her father is excellent, with all his subtle infantilizing reinforcing how unseriously Sam takes his daughters and women in general. Fred Melamed is such an awesome presence, with the total lack of shame necessary to play such a piece of shit and to show off his giant, gross body in the sauna.

    The supporting cast is full of recognizable comedy people, with Tig Notaro and Nick Offerman standing out as the sound technicians. I don't mind Ken Marino's schtick when he's as good at it as he is. I've never been a Demetri Martin fan, and that opinion wasn't altered here. I was already pretty unimpressed by him and his character, then he offered Carol homeopathic sleeping pills, and that was it for him altogether. Very little patience for mainstream pimping of alternative medicine. Geena Davis was also perfectly cast as the studio executive.

    The overall message about the underestimation of female voices is something I can get on board with. Last year, one of Peter's friends, a very professional-looking, ostensibly successful woman around my age drove us to the airport to fly to Vegas, and what I was left with after she drove off was how fucking annoying all her upspeak was. Lumping that in with sexy-baby-voice, I don't really know why women talk like that, though I could put together a large societal reason that has little to do with the individual. I do know it makes people take those who talk like that much less seriously, and good on Bell for essentially making that her theme.

    Pleasant, if not funny, script, competent direction, some great performances, and no outright bad scenes get this into the B range. The overall messiness of the script keeps it at a B-. Also, fuck you, homeopathy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bias rearing its ugly head again in your reviews. I took the homeopathic sleeping pills as being very mocking of Hollywood-type doctoring.

      Delete
    2. I'm curious.. if you think the film would have done better to add another 15 or so minutes to flesh out some of the side stories and attach them to the main plot more.... or cut them all, forcing Bell to find another way to build Carol's surrounding world and add time to the movie?

      Delete
    3. Also, well done on recognizing Geena Davis as not being Sigourney Weaver!

      Everybody laugh at Shane!

      Delete
    4. Either option would work. Moe and Dani are off in their own movie, and needed their plot to either tie itself into the climax at the awards show or be cut way down. I don't even think their stuff was thematically related to Carol. Me and You and Everyone We Know annoyed the shit out of me, but it was absolutely thematically consistent with all its storylines.

      Reasonable people can disagree about the worth of monasteries. Not the case with homeopathy. The homeopathic thing is going to sail over most people's heads because not a lot of people know what homeopathy is, or they wouldn't take it. It wasn't a joke, he just happened to have some sleeping pills, and she asked for them again later. It's not impacting my grade, it's just something that made me roll my eyes when the movie didn't want me to.

      Delete
    5. What would even be in homeopathic sleeping pills? It's it homeopathy basically taking whatever your ailment is in a small dose? What is the watered down medicinal form of sleeplessness? If i hand you a skittle and say it'll make you sleep, and you believe it... it'll work, right?

      Delete
    6. I'd hate to see the reaction to offering Kissel a cup of tea for a sore throat.

      Delete
    7. And my definition of homeopathy wasn't close.

      Delete
    8. "I'm curious.. if you think the film would have done better to add another 15 or so minutes to flesh out some of the side stories and attach them to the main plot more.... or cut them all, forcing Bell to find another way to build Carol's surrounding world and add time to the movie?"

      I think Kissel nailed this with the thematic aspect. Side plots are fine to not tie in if they are used as some sort of foil or allegory. Off the top of my head, the Paul Rudd/Leslie Mann portions of Knocked Up work here. Their storyline doesn't necessarily advance the main story, but it is used a sort of window into the future of Seth Rogen & Katherine Heigl where two people who aren't right for each other just stay together.

      Also, Bryan gives Knocked Up an A- b/c there's a fantasy baseball draft scene in there.

      Delete
    9. The whole crude-comedy genre period we have been going through does not float my boat. Seth Rogan might be one of my least favorite actors - my voice feels hoarse just typing his name. "Huh - Oh my god!!!" - every Seth Rogan movie.

      Delete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This was a comedy? Glad we are stretching that word. I mean, I laughed a few times but I wasn't impressed. Her overall message is women can do the job just as good and at times better than men.

    Yeah, it was ironic that she slept with the guy from whom she stole a key part and beat her asshole father for the "Amazon Games" trailer but big deal. Geena Davis' character flat out told her she was not the best and she got the nod because she was a woman and it fit with the film's feminist message. Talk about a slap in the face to feminism.

    No, Bobby, Lake Bell does not deserve a nomination for best actress. She was mediocre at best and annoying throughout the film. Agree with Jon on Bell's message and she makes it clear, but In a World... is one of these films trying to make new brand statement. Like many of you stated Drinking Buddies was "mumblecore," In a World... is "interruption." It was as if Bell made it a rule that no one could make a complete thought without someone interjecting. So annoying. Yes, she attempted to make the awkwardness of dating real but geez Louise, it is not that weird. I refrained from yelling at the television.

    Dimitri Martin is a terrible actor. He needs to stay with telling jokes because he is way better at that. He is the reverse of Anzi Ansari. Yes, Offerman was great. I kept thinking he was going to play a saxophone while wearing that fedora. That would have been awesome.

    All in all, a decent story (which failed to keep my interest), decent directing, ok acting, and a bad comedy.

    Grade: C

    P.S. Kudos to Bobby for not picking another weird ass movie!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Have you paid any attention to people today? People are always interrupted... always. Especially women... so it's a bit of a flip when Carol keeps interrupting Louis... good on that.

      Demitri isn't a strong actor, which is why he was giving a role he's good at... awkward self. I don't think Bell was trying to speak on the awkwardness of dating in general, but was focused on the individuals involved there. For many people, I'm sure that's pretty close to how it would go, even if you can't relate.

      What exactly was annoying about Bell's performance? 'Sister code' was the most annoying thing Carol did, and it was portrayed that way... intentionally, as her sister was even like 'what the fuck is this?'

      Fair points on the comedy... something we've talked about a lot here. If you're not buying into the humor of a comedy, the movie is gonna take a hit from the go.

      And no worries, I have weird movies lined up for later rounds! :D

      Delete
  13. Aziz Ansari? Completely not funny in real life and the worst most annoying unfanny character on Parks and Rec and everything else I've ever seen him in. I don't understand you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Whether you like Aziz or not... his 50 Cent joke is comedy gold.

      Delete
    2. How do you hate the comedy stylings of Aziz Ansari?! I think he's great as Tom. Riley, I need you to defend him being the worst character in Parks and Rec. I would argue the worst character of the "zany side characters" is probably.... Man this is a tough one.... probably April.

      Delete
    3. The worst lines on the show involve harassing Jerry. I think it's a better show without his character.

      Delete
    4. I love me some April... she's one of my favs. But I actually like Tom's character too. .. but agree Bryan, most of the Jerry/Garry/Larry.... stuff isn't all that good.

      Delete
    5. I assume you're referring to 50 cent and grapefruits. Didn't even smile. You got me though, Jerry is the biggest waste. Aziz is just so damn one note he's disturbingly unfunny to me.

      Delete
    6. How can you not love the grapefruit joke?!

      Delete
    7. His standup isn't that good. But I did love him in This is the End and in Flight of the Conchords

      Delete
  14. Sean, Aziz is hilarious as Tom but terrible as a stand up comedian. Good comedy actor.

    Bobby, not everyone is interrupted. Some people have manners and let them finish what they have to say. Clearly, you do not experience that. Yes, I get interrupted at times because of my profession sometimes I interrupt others for the same reason but not all the time by other people. Her point is made but she was annoying in making it.

    Her presence, mannerisms, actions, and character just annoyed me. She just "had" to get the male Irish accent after being told no like ten times by her sister. That is what a child does. Why venture in Gustaf's (sp?) house? That is creepy. Why freak out after every pause when talking to Louis? The way Bell portrayed the character annoyed me. I wanted to shoot in the face with a water gun or spray bottle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, not everybody is, but it is definitely common occurrence... nearly as much as cell phone usage during conversation. You may not experience it as much as others, but if you people watch enough, it's pretty ridiculous.

      Wasn't there a quote somewhere... "Nothing can take the place of persistence..."? Or maybe that's only for men? :-p I think Bell portrayed Carol exactly as she wrote the character... And looking at her life (relationships, career, etc), it's pretty clear as to why she is that way. That's not to say you have to like the character, but I think Bell acted out exactly what she wanted from that character.

      I wonder now... Who would you rather hang out with.. Carol or Frances Ha?!

      Delete
    2. Oh, please. That quote has nothing to do with interruptions from either men or women. Just because I did not like the character and found her annoying does not mean I am some misogynist so do not start that noise.

      Of course you think she acted out exactly what she wanted. You liked the film so you are going to give her performance high marks. I found it to be average due to her performance and overall story. I'd like to see another movie with her in it to see if she is a good actress.

      To answer your question, I do not know. Carol might make me chuckle once or twice but I have no clue.

      Delete
    3. The persistence mention has nothing to do with the interruptions discussion, and everything to do with her trying to get the Irish accent recorded. I thought that would be clear, my bad there.

      And me liking a film has nothing to do with whether I liked an acting performance. And her performances in other movies would have nothing to do with how she managed in this one. From reading what you said.. it feels as if you disliked the character more than you disliked Bell's acting... which is completely reasonable.

      Delete
    4. Also, watch Million Dollar Arm and you can see Bell a bit of acting opposite Jon Hamm. Meh movie, but hooray baseball!

      Delete
  15. "I wonder now... Who would you rather hang out with.. Carol or Frances Ha?!"

    Worst night ever.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Carol >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Frances.

      Hanging out with both at the same time... that'd be interesting!

      Delete
    2. Frances would try to play fight and Carol would give her that weird look and put her in a headlock.

      Delete