“Dear Zachary” is one of the few documentaries that could
not have been a movie. No movie this
infuriating and depressing would ever be made.
Hell, the fact that it even exists in this form is some kind of twisted
version of serendipity. This is the most
affecting movie I have ever watched, pulling out emotions from me that I didn’t
know I could have for people I have never met.
It’s an incredible story that filmmaker Kurt Kuenne does a great job in
almost every aspect of, and is especially effective with unexpected twists in
the story.
Let’s start with just the raw emotions of this thing. I hit numerous emotions I just don’t like to
deal with on a regular basis. I couldn’t
help but feel pity for Andrew, the sad clown who was loved by all but himself. I got serious chills hearing the calls from
Shirley talking so non-chalantly to Zachary’s “babysitters” Dave and Kate. I couldn’t help but feel exasperated when
hearing about the legal proceedings and the lunacy that surround that whole
saga. Then, not sadness for the big
reveal of Zachary’s murder, but, much like Dave, I felt sheer anger. How could you not? The system had failed them in spectacular
fashion. In the end, when Kuenne went to
the roll of everyone talking about Dave and Kate… Oh it got QUITE DUSTY in the
Crone household. How many movies can
pull out that many emotions so effectively?
I would say it’s in the single digits.
It probably helps that it’s a documentary, so everything we are seeing
is very real.
It would be tough to experience these emotions if Kuenne
didn’t do a good job of leading the audience through the story. He set up each transition well, and built
suspense for what would happen next like any good storyteller does. He maybe went a little overboard with the
murder reveal, but it worked well. He
needed to fill time there to give the audience adequate time to recover from
the megaton he dropped at that point.
The section detailing Shirley’s clear mental instability was the most
well-done portion of the movie, where he splices facts about her with repeating
the one judge’s lines about Shirley’s crime being specific in nature and that
she was not a threat to the general public.
I think I could feel my blood pressure skyrocketing during that
particular portion.
Kuenne was able to lead the audience so effectively because
this story was happening as he was making the movie. I used the word already, but serendipity is
the only word that comes to mind when thinking about how this movie was
made. Kuenne had a ton of footage of
Andrew from their various movies. He had
all the stuff with Zachary. He had
interviews with Dave & Kate pre- and post-Zachary. With that many twists happening as he’s
making the movie, Kuenne had to do quite a bit of changing his focus on the
fly. We start with a purpose of one last
movie with Andrew and then go into the letter to Zachary gimmick, sticking with
it throughout, even after the tragedy. I
did like Kuenne openly questioning why he was continuing, and finally finding
reason by dedicating the movie to Dave & Kate, who went through an
unimaginable hell and came out the other end… intact if nothing else. Good on Dave getting a minister to admit his
plan to potentially murder Shirley was “logical.”I was also glad that Kuenne chose an angle and stuck with it – namely, the incompetence of the court system in Canada to not get Shirley extradited. I felt like he did a good job weaving together the legal battle with the personal battle between Shirley and Dave & Kate. It helped that it was a straight chronological telling of the story, but the transitions could have been jarring if done ineffectively.
There are other issues that could certainly be explored here, namely our society’s treatment of people with clear mental health issues. This is going to only continue to become a bigger story in our society. We don’t learn much about Shirley, but we do know she left three kids behind, so a version from her POV highlighting mental health issues we have in this country is a story worth telling. However, had Kuenne focused on that, we would need quite a bit of time learning more about Shirley. Kuenne’s intention was not to humanize her, and for good reason – she did almost certainly kill his best friend. Would you want to humanize someone like that? This was a very personal story for all involved, and it showed and benefitted from it ultimately.
The fact that this is so personal is what keeps it from
being perfect for me. The first 30
minutes of the movie, before we know who “Zachary” even is, was Kurt making his
movie with Andrew. This was a little
choppy and didn’t flow well. My only
other minor complaint was the goofy moving mouths on the judges. Was this done for comedy relief? If so, it felt a little out of place,
especially in the last third of the movie.
Many of my favorite documentaries start down one path and
wind up somewhere completely different.
Had “Dear Zachary” stayed as a letter to Andrew’s living son, it would
have still been a very good documentary with some justice at the end. However, through this heinous tragedy, we end
up with something very unique that we will likely never see again. It was one of those docs that, thanks to all
the source material available to Kuenne, was going to be good and he just
needed to make it great. I think he
pulled that off.
+ Kuenne leads us through the story well
+ Has a message and sticks to it- Early third did not flow well
