Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Dear Zachary


“Dear Zachary” is one of the few documentaries that could not have been a movie.  No movie this infuriating and depressing would ever be made.  Hell, the fact that it even exists in this form is some kind of twisted version of serendipity.  This is the most affecting movie I have ever watched, pulling out emotions from me that I didn’t know I could have for people I have never met.  It’s an incredible story that filmmaker Kurt Kuenne does a great job in almost every aspect of, and is especially effective with unexpected twists in the story.
Let’s start with just the raw emotions of this thing.  I hit numerous emotions I just don’t like to deal with on a regular basis.  I couldn’t help but feel pity for Andrew, the sad clown who was loved by all but himself.  I got serious chills hearing the calls from Shirley talking so non-chalantly to Zachary’s “babysitters” Dave and Kate.  I couldn’t help but feel exasperated when hearing about the legal proceedings and the lunacy that surround that whole saga.  Then, not sadness for the big reveal of Zachary’s murder, but, much like Dave, I felt sheer anger.  How could you not?  The system had failed them in spectacular fashion.  In the end, when Kuenne went to the roll of everyone talking about Dave and Kate… Oh it got QUITE DUSTY in the Crone household.  How many movies can pull out that many emotions so effectively?  I would say it’s in the single digits.  It probably helps that it’s a documentary, so everything we are seeing is very real.
It would be tough to experience these emotions if Kuenne didn’t do a good job of leading the audience through the story.  He set up each transition well, and built suspense for what would happen next like any good storyteller does.  He maybe went a little overboard with the murder reveal, but it worked well.  He needed to fill time there to give the audience adequate time to recover from the megaton he dropped at that point.  The section detailing Shirley’s clear mental instability was the most well-done portion of the movie, where he splices facts about her with repeating the one judge’s lines about Shirley’s crime being specific in nature and that she was not a threat to the general public.  I think I could feel my blood pressure skyrocketing during that particular portion.
Kuenne was able to lead the audience so effectively because this story was happening as he was making the movie.  I used the word already, but serendipity is the only word that comes to mind when thinking about how this movie was made.  Kuenne had a ton of footage of Andrew from their various movies.  He had all the stuff with Zachary.  He had interviews with Dave & Kate pre- and post-Zachary.  With that many twists happening as he’s making the movie, Kuenne had to do quite a bit of changing his focus on the fly.  We start with a purpose of one last movie with Andrew and then go into the letter to Zachary gimmick, sticking with it throughout, even after the tragedy.  I did like Kuenne openly questioning why he was continuing, and finally finding reason by dedicating the movie to Dave & Kate, who went through an unimaginable hell and came out the other end… intact if nothing else.  Good on Dave getting a minister to admit his plan to potentially murder Shirley was “logical.”

I was also glad that Kuenne chose an angle and stuck with it – namely, the incompetence of the court system in Canada to not get Shirley extradited.  I felt like he did a good job weaving together the legal battle with the personal battle between Shirley and Dave & Kate.  It helped that it was a straight chronological telling of the story, but the transitions could have been jarring if done ineffectively.
There are other issues that could certainly be explored here, namely our society’s treatment of people with clear mental health issues.  This is going to only continue to become a bigger story in our society.  We don’t learn much about Shirley, but we do know she left three kids behind, so a version from her POV highlighting mental health issues we have in this country is a story worth telling.  However, had Kuenne focused on that, we would need quite a bit of time learning more about Shirley.  Kuenne’s intention was not to humanize her, and for good reason – she did almost certainly kill his best friend.  Would you want to humanize someone like that?  This was a very personal story for all involved, and it showed and benefitted from it ultimately.

The fact that this is so personal is what keeps it from being perfect for me.  The first 30 minutes of the movie, before we know who “Zachary” even is, was Kurt making his movie with Andrew.  This was a little choppy and didn’t flow well.  My only other minor complaint was the goofy moving mouths on the judges.  Was this done for comedy relief?  If so, it felt a little out of place, especially in the last third of the movie.
Many of my favorite documentaries start down one path and wind up somewhere completely different.  Had “Dear Zachary” stayed as a letter to Andrew’s living son, it would have still been a very good documentary with some justice at the end.  However, through this heinous tragedy, we end up with something very unique that we will likely never see again.  It was one of those docs that, thanks to all the source material available to Kuenne, was going to be good and he just needed to make it great.  I think he pulled that off.

 + Very affecting
+ Kuenne leads us through the story well
+ Has a message and sticks to it

- Early third did not flow well

 Grade: A

29 comments:

  1. I can't bring myself to write a review of this. I think I'm going to go sleep in my daughter's room - slumber party!

    I was annoyed when Lily wanted out and I never picked up my phone. This was one hell of a roller coaster. I'll have to sleep on a grade.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not suspicious of every 45 year old, ugly, blonde female I see. Thanks Phil.

      Delete
    2. You're welcome. Did you ever come up with a grade?

      Delete
  2. Blogspot's ability to work on mobile is infuriating. I purposely avoid terribly sad things, discussing this movie sounds painful outside of the documentary genre stylings.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This... Is a hard movie to review. Basically if I did, I'd be repeating exactly what Phil said. This is exactly what everyone used to do in Fiji meetings, so I'll spare everyone from reliving that.

    Some brief thoughts...

    It was an interesting choice to not go straight to people being sad after Zachary's murder was revealed. That was unexpected, but was entirely a natural reaction. We mentioned this in talking about Mad Men the other day. Movies and shows that do things just to be shocking without making it a natural reaction of the characters suffer from lesser writing. I think this is a reason that when Game of Thrones kills someone off it's successful. Joff killing Ned made sense and was in character. The Red Wedding made sense as well. Etc, etc. I felt that anger along side my sadness. Well done.

    I loved that the director didn't attempt to interpret the legal issues as anything more than a layperson. People are awful at understanding the law, but because it's something we face on a daily basis, they think they have a quality opinion because, like, everyone has a right to an opinion, man! Sure. But some opinions are worse than others. He approaches the legal stuff genuinely confused and stopped there. Well done. For an example of a documentary that fails in this regard, check out Blackfish. (I left some brief thoughts on the legal issues in my entirely too long review on SidePieces.)

    I think the faces talking was an attempt to put a face to the things being said. It gives the viewer another target to despise. Being mad at the system is overwhelming and ineffectual. Being mad at people who perpetuate stupidity isn't.

    Personal Thought:
    Finally, I'm really happy that we reacted in the same way, Phil. One of my pet peeves is when a kid dies, people say shit like, "Oh. When you have a child, you'll understand how bad this really is." Really? People are incapable of empathy if they haven't experienced it? I hate that stance and it gives parents a bad name. I don't want to be one of those pretentious asshole parents who says shit like that. Of course you'll love your child in a unique way, but that's pretty much every close relationship. So when Phil, a childless smartass, is emotionally devastated by this movie, it shows that people who say that shit really are being assholes.

    So thinking of a criticism and I'm guessing some idiots felt that this movie was manipulative. If this were fiction, I might even agree. But it's not. It's real life. If you feel emotional it's because this movie was so well done that it made you care about strangers. That's not being manipulative, that's being human. And it's not taking advantage of the family. Clearly they supported the project and the project supported them. We've all been through the death of someone close. I remember for Geoff, the best thing we did that night was sharing ridiculous stories. Doing things like that keeps the memories alive and let's you hold on just a bit more. I think that's important and natural. This movie is a great gift to Andrew's family and friends.

    A

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good review Shane - my only question is what kept it from an A+ for you? Was the subject just too heavy to get it over the hump? Your review doesn't really read with any issues except issues you anticipated others potentially having.

      Delete
    2. This may be a cop out, but to go from A to A+ is probably subjective. A means is a great movie, maybe even perfect, but that doesn't mean I enjoy it. An A+ means I enjoy it and want to watch again. I don't know if I want to watch again, but not because of the emotions. But rather because we already know the "twist." I don't know if I'd enjoy going through it again. That may not make any sense at all.

      Delete
    3. I already hit on my gripe with "rewatchability," so I won't belabor the point.

      So, much like the possibility that a Kung Fu movie has a ceiling, an intensely-depressing movie has a ceiling as well? That I can buy.

      Delete
  4. This movie is one of many examples of why I hate documentaries. We have an objectively great documentary that elicits all the feels (ok only the feels related to anger and sadness). We gain a quick understanding of who everyone is and build on that. We get the knife turning twist and all the sads followed by all the support. Great movie. My problem- Why would anyone choose to watch this movie.

    Objectively- A
    minus points for the fact that I'll never rewatch it or recommend it to anyone else- Final Grade:
    B+

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What follows your "Why I hate documentaries" statement makes no sense. Is the bad part the knife twist? If so, not all documentaries have that moment. I don't understand that statement.

      Why is rewatchability a knock? Plenty of movies don't have to be rewatchable but are objectively fantastic. Who wants to take another spin on 12 Years a Slave?

      And why not recommend it? It has a powerful message at the end - even in the face of such tragedy, Dave & Kate perservere. They felt they were alone, yet they were not, with all of their other "adoptive children" giving them messages of hope & love. This was what really touched me in the end of the movie. I probably should have pointed that out in my initial review.

      Delete
    2. Fair points Mr. Crone, perhaps my views were distorted from an emotional perspective having written immediately after viewing. And you're right I didn't really support the first sentence. I got no enjoyment from watching this movie and haven't found a doc that I got enjoyment from.

      Delete
    3. A lot of docs have conflicts that do not resolve themselves in a way that I think many would consider "fair," so I can see the reasoning there. However, there are some more fun docs out there where the subject isn't as heavy or everyone gets what's coming to them such as:

      - Exit Through The Gift Shop
      - King of Kong
      - Overnight
      - Queen of Versaille??? (Anyone who has seen this, agree? Without spoiling too much, I feel like everyone pretty much ends up where they deserve to end up.)

      I've also heard Jiro Dreams of Sushi can fall into this, but I've yet to see it.

      Delete
    4. Jiro Dreams of Sushi is pretty good. Watched it while I had the worst hangover I've ever had and still enjoyed it.

      Delete
  5. I want to talk about manipulation.

    It's impossible to watch this and not feel deeply moved. That was just as true for me watching it a second time as it was when I originally watched it. When a movie is so uniformly able to drag the same response out of the viewer, I get a little skeptical. The planet is awash in injustice and sad stories, equal to and worse than this one. Making an audience sad strikes me as less art than science. Plucking heartstrings and squeezing tear ducts is easy and repeatable. Scores are fine-tuned to drag emotions out, big performances get the most attention, and writerly/editing tricks prime the pump for the crushing moment. I appreciate a movie that can make me cry, but on the continuum from depression to ecstasy, grief tears are the easiest and therefore the least impressive. I'm sure Steel Magnolias or Terms of Endearment could make me cry, but it's a calculated effort to where that can be the only result.

    Dear Zachary escapes this problem in two ways. First, everything actually happened, and everyone involved took a lot of pictures and videos. It keeps the manipulation to a minimum because the story is the same and can be conveyed the same without any extra editing. Just put one home movie or news segment after the next, splice in your interviews, and you're done. Second, this movie doesn't work as well if the director wasn't intimately involved with the Bagby's before everything happened. Without the personal connection, it's a very special episode of Dateline. This would be a good movie based on the events themselves no matter what. It's a great movie because of how invested Kuenne is.

    There are so many human moments in this, which I'm going to wholly put on Kuenne and how his relationship with Bagby earns him the comfort of his subjects. Standout 'characters' for me are the backwoods redneck, who I thought had the single greatest line in the movie. The laid-back, resigned sadness of one of Bagby's colleagues got to me, and obviously, Dave and Kate. His anger made me jump, just like the first time I watched it. They're so clearly and genuinely good people, that to see their devastation is the worst part.

    Kuenne is on track for most of the film. The mission creep of the project is obviously depressing, but that it kept having to take different forms while still being of a piece is so impressive. The editing shines in a lot of places, in the juxtaposition of Andrew and Zachary's baby pictures or the mannerisms of Dave and Andrew. The pacing puts the viewer in the mindset of someone this is actually happening to. A recap of Andrew's life is interrupted by reports and details of his death, and Shirley's abduction of Zachary comes out of nowhere with only natural foreshadowing. I loved that one subject acknowledges the phenomenon of grief blinders, but insists that all she's saying about Andrew's qualities are true. That had to be acknowledged and I'm glad it was. I also loved that the music and narration drops out when Zachary is born.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good points about manipulation. Melodrama seems to be a rising trend as of late. We can probably thank the success of The Notebook for that. Personally, I absolutely hate movies like that.

      Does anyone remember a couple years back when a movie called My Sister's Keeper came out? I never saw it, but the trailer was essentially shouting at the audience to have fun bawling at this movie. If I Stay is another movie that just came out and had that same vibe. Anna actually complained to me that movies like these have become "The New Chick Flick" and no one is making rom-coms anymore. Amazingly, she has a point.

      Delete
  6. On the negative side, there were a few images that were just too on-the-nose, like a lingering shot of ripples in a pond or a No Access sign. The inclusion of the son watching his dad cry was unnecessary. The news of Zachary's death had that jarring, flashing-light sequence that I did not like at all. That moment doesn't need any extra polish. I'm conflicted on Kuenne's voice cracking when he's running down the details of Zachary's death. If it was someone being interviewed, sure, but from the narrator, it feels off.

    This is still in the A-range because of the rawness and realness of the events. This would be like Roman Polanski making a documentary about his wife being killed, or Bill Cosby about his son. I'm sure it was extremely difficult for all involved to complete it after Zachary died, but I'm very happy they did. This is a sad story that avoids manipulation, something that very few similar movies can lay claim to. A-

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I imagine Kuenne likely debated with himself as to whether to include the take with his voice cracking or continuing to try for a clean take. Clearly an assumption but I'm guessing he kept the cracking because it represents the rawness and reality of the emotions for him as a filmmaker. At one point one of his subjects asks who will be interviewing him. His narration is his interview and without his emotion he can be any filmmaker or the Dateline staffer you mentioned.

      Delete
    2. I did think the voice cracking was a little manipulative, but I didn't care. It was likely exactly how Kuenne felt at that moment, taking us on the journey with him and everyone else around him.

      Delete
    3. Ah, something I mentioned in my first take before it deleting. I agree with Sean here. We can't really talk about how Kuenne's connection to the story is key to its success and then knock him for showing the emotion that clearly comes with being connected to it. I'm glad he used that clip... it reminded us that he wasn't just making a film here.

      Delete
  7. My gosh; what an emotional ride. I don't have much to say except this. I don't normally believe in vigilance - like in the way the right wing argues gun rights - but that Canadian system of law failed and David Bagby would be perfectly vigilant in his actions to end Shirley's sad and demented life. From what was shown, I would probably praise it.

    I could mention how Shirley was mentally ill but Bobby would come around with that simplistic Dave Chappelle quote about how we failed to understand her and/or how it is too easy to label someone like that. That is exactly what I am comfortable doing. Shirley Turner was psychotic and the film produced preponderance of evidence to support that claim.

    In all, Andrew Bagby was beloved by a lot of people and hated by only one. The several people interviewed cared a lot for him and Zachary. Kudos to David and Kate for keeping the fight alive and becoming the positive change they wanted to see.

    Grade: A-

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That 2nd paragraph is clearly a bait.... I'll take it, because you seem to be missing the point of what Dave Chappelle said.

      Shirley Turner's mental health was documented, she had psych evaluations, outpatient treatments, and she was seeing a professional who deals with mental disorders.

      This is completely different from dismissing a person and calling them 'crazy' because we don't understand them or because they talk/act/look differently from what we expect or want.

      And major part of the problem is how our society sees and treats mental illness.



      Delete
    2. "And major part of the problem is how our society sees and treats mental illness."

      Pretty much. I've worked in three areas of a company that now calls itself a "well-being company," and while we look at physicial medical claims quite a bit, we don't do a lot of analysis around mental health claims. Not b/c they're necessary to look at... there just aren't that many too look at.

      Anna and I actually watched a pretty good 60 Minutes piece about some kid that tried to kill his dad then killed himself. The night before, his dad was trying to put him in the hospital, but could not b/c there was nothing physically wrong with him.

      Mental health should be the next great reform we have in our health care system. The current infrastructure is pathetic. I think we're going to hear more and more about this over the next 5-10 years.

      Like I said in my review though, I wouldn't expect Kuenne to go into this. Kuenne was not about to go out of his way to humanize Shirley, and I really don't blame him for that after all she did to the people in his life.

      Delete
    3. Also, Drew - why "just" an A-? What kept it from A or A+?

      Delete
    4. I actually wasn't baiting you but I had a feeling you would respond. I get the Chappelle quote and why you like to use it. As you stated, you feel it is easy for us to dismiss someone as crazy or mentally ill because we don't understand them.

      What bugs me about that is you mention it when we discuss characters we do not know but at least try to understand in the context presented to us and it as though the debate ends on the character's mental awareness due to the invocation of the Chappelle quote. Now, I agree with you that it is easy for us to label someone one way but as college educated people, we are not simply dismissing them; it is our description of their behavior - unusual to us or not.

      In the context of Shirley Turner, we can say through documentation that she was a psychopath. We disagree, however, on the mentality of DeNiro in Taxi Driver and Brando in Apocalypse Now. I'm not dismissing them as crazy but describing them in the context presented. That's what we attempt to do.

      Delete
    5. Phil, this is an A- because of its - although rightfully so - bias. In a documentary, I should not have a narrator; just depiction. That is why I love Jesus Camp and The Revisionaries as they have no narration.

      An A- is not a terrible grade. I think it is a great documentary and really strikes the emotional chord.

      Delete
    6. I can't remember the name of the movie... I think it's "While the Fire Burns" or "As the Fire Burns"..... but if no narration is your thing, I've heard that's a great one.

      I don't know if I agree with knocking a movie for bias, but to each their own. It puts an artificial ceiling on the review from the word go.

      Delete
    7. LET THE FIRE BURN... that's the name of the movie. Drew, watch it and report back with your thoughts.

      Delete
  8. Holy Hell

    As I was watching, I quickly recalled hearing something about Andrew Bagby's story, and while I didn't remember any details at all, I felt prepared for something really heavy here... and it didn't matter. You could know every detail about this tragedy, and Dear Zachary would still hit you hard.

    Movies show time and time again that emotions are generally easy to pull at. The difficult thing is to pull real emotions that last longer than the moment. Kuenne does this throughout the film and it's instrumental in its success. I think two things really accomplished this.

    The first, as it's been mentioned, is the fact that Kuenne is personally invested in the story. So often in documentaries we see interviews that consist of timid answers that don't feel genuine... as if they don't trust the interviewer/filmmaker to keep what they say with in the context. Everybody that Kuenne talks to appears to be geniune and open. They trust him to use what they say in the best possible way.. because he's one of them.

    Then there's the technical side. I thought Kuenne's editing is spot on. It's a very deliberate choice to be quick with the pictures. We barely see any of them for more than an instant. We're not allowed to focus on one image... until it was repeated and the emphasis on something really stood out. When telling us about the gunshot wounds Bagby suffered, we were shown the corresponding places on the body through pictures of Bagby as a child... at first this bothered me, but i quickly realized it was because of how powerful those images were. And even more so, when the big reveal happened... it proved to be an amazing moment of foreshadowing.

    Throughout the interviews I kept thinking about how amazing Kate and David are. I rarely consider myself a person of empathy, but I felt their grief, their pain, their anger... I was absolutely thrilled when Kuenne decided to not only finish the film for them, but redirect its message to Kate and David.

    I feel like you guys were right on about the intent of the film in the end, attacking the system that failed. I was happy to find out that Kate and David have succeeded (likely with the help of this film) to some extent so far, as a bill was passed in 2010 refusing to allow bail for those accused of such serious crimes, especially when the safety of a minor is called into question.

    This film could have easily landed an A+ from me, but there are a few stylistic choices that I couldn't ignore. The first was the flashing screen and noise when we're told about Zachary's fate. The second is a couple of moments when the score/music felt over the top. This movie is driven by emotion... the way the story was presented, the images, the interviews, the timing, etc.. was all perfect. The moments, especially the big turn, were so packed with emotion on their own that the sights and sounds served only as a distraction to what I was feeling... this wasn't a fictional horror movie where i needed my reality suspended and my feeling amplified. I was already filled with sorrow and unnerved with anger. I didn't need help. I needed to be left with the naturally occurring emotions from the reality of what happened.

    So yeah, Dear Zachary is one of the best documentaries I may ever watch. Kuenne's connection to the story he tells and how he presents it really does do it justice. I'm sure there's more to be said, but I think it's mostly been covered by the group. As I said.. if it wasn't for the unnecessary and distracting style choices, this is an A+ film... but for me, Dear Zachary ends up a solid A

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I had a better review mostly typed out, and then lost it with the backspace button... that's what I get for not writing in in Word or Notepad first like I usually do. Bah.

      Delete